match them.Whats badFans are clearly unsure about the job manager Bra

More than two decades ago, the leaders at Texas and Oklahoma foresaw the college landscape shifting. Looking to build a more viable and stable league with greater television capability, Texas athletic director DeLoss Dodds and his Oklahoma counterpart Donnie Duncan convened to map out what would ultimately become the Big 12.As the Red River rivals prepare to meet for the 111th time this weekend in Dallas, the conference the two forged together is on the brink.The Big 12 is the smallest Power 5 league, the only one without a conference network and, as its own board chair termed it, psychologically disadvantaged.Going into a critical Oct. 17 meeting of league presidents and chancellors, the overriding question that could determine the fate of the conference figures to be this: Can Oklahoma and Texas still save the Big 12?And do they even want to?Absolutely they can save the Big 12, without question, said one conference insider. But theyve also had plenty of opportunities to lay the cards down that way.And have yet to indicate that.The Big 12s exploration of expansion this year has jump-started the discussion of a grant of rights extension way ahead of schedule, as the rights dont expire for another nine years.When ESPN agreed to give the ACC a conference network this summer, the ACC reciprocated by agreeing to extend its rights for another decade through 2036. Could the Big 12 follow a similar path?Even though the conference has yet to even vote on expansion -- which may or may not happen Oct. 17, depending on whom you ask -- neither Oklahoma nor Texas has intimated it has any intention of signing a rights extension in concert with an expansion move -- with a Big 12 official terming it an apparent non-starter.That has left the other eight schools in the Big 12 feeling a bit insecure about their future affiliation, with another conference source stating the obvious: The Big 12 cant survive without Texas and Oklahoma.One league official likened the budding situation to a pair of star players nearing their free agency. Instead of inking extensions with their current team, they seem intent on testing the free agency waters. And when the rights near their expiration, the Sooners and Longhorns could be, as yet another official put it, floating around like bees.In spite of the uncertainty, a pair of industry insiders that dont work in the Big 12 see a more bullish future for the conference.I really see it as them protecting themselves until the dust settles a little more, said one insider. I dont think its because theyre entirely dissatisfied being in the Big 12.This season has done nothing to quell the internal anxiety about the Big 12s viability, as the conference was collectively clocked on the field during its out-of-conference slate, rapidly reducing its playoff aspirations to an improbability.But as the same insider pointed out, the dust could settle before the rights deal expires in a manner that could make the Big 12 seem more tenable for Oklahoma and Texas than it might right now. The playoff, for example, could expand to eight spots, which in theory would give the Big 12 a cleaner path to the postseason. And the proliferation of online streaming, as another example, could provide the Big 12 with several bankable opportunities to park its tier 3 rights.The Big 12 is highly dysfunctional in many areas. But their brand is still strong. Theyre still making money. The Big 12 is really doing better than the perception out there, the insider said. And when you think about it, Oklahoma and Texas fit best in the Big 12 for a lot of reasons.Indeed, the Big 12 still fits the Longhorns and Sooners in a number of ways, even as the angst among both fan bases continues to balloon.Notwithstanding West Virginia, the footprint of the league is sensible for both schools, especially considering some of the alternatives.Though conference realignment has gutted several of its top rivalries, the Big 12 still boasts the Red River Showdown, which remains one of the sports most iconic games.The Big 12 is the only league with a tier 3 framework in which Texas can continue its lucrative Longhorn Network, which pays the school an average of $15 million a year.And in the Big 12, as the national brands and founding members, Texas and Oklahoma wield influence in the boardroom in a manner they wouldnt be able to in any other Power 5 conference. In fact, if it resulted in a rights extension, one Big 12 official suggested that the league would be perfectly fine with giving Texas the authority to pick one expansion school, and Oklahoma, the other.Of course, the Big 12 has enormous challenges ahead in order to remain a viable league, as commissioner Bob Bowlsby has repeatedly acknowledged.The Big 12 is the only Power 5 league without a conference network, which is a great source of the consternation Oklahoma president David Boren has expressed about the league.While the Big 12s distribution of $30.4 million per school is currently competitive with the other Power 5 leagues, Bowlsby has pointed out that the conference is primed to lose ground to the Big Ten and SEC, which both boast bigger markets, larger stadiums and remunerative conference networks.Even then, the second insider countered that the Big 12 still has plenty to offer.I dont think theres any reason why -- if the current members remain committed to it -- the Big 12 couldnt be a substantial and competitive entity going forward, the insider said. The truth is, the angst around it now has been self-created, through the effort to look at this expansion issue and the public comments made about it. Personally, I dont see why it couldnt continue to be a viable entity into the future. Its included in the autonomy group. It has strong access to the playoff bowl games. Its basketball has been succeeding at a very high level. Maybe theyre a little bit short on the inventory compared to bigger conferences, but what they have is content still desirable to entities out there that, in the future, will want to broadcast college sports.What matters, though, is, to what conclusion will Texas and Oklahoma come? While the allure of, say, the Big Ten or SEC or Pac-12 could be enticing, there is evidence to suggest that the Sooners and Longhorns could continue to thrive in the Big 12 in various ways.Though much has been made of the SEC recruiting some of the top talent out of Texas, the Red River schools have proven they can still recruit at a high level.Under Charlie Strong, the Longhorns have reeled in back-to-back top-10 recruiting classes, despite consecutive losing seasons on the field.Oklahoma, meanwhile, currently owns the nations fifth-best recruiting class, which includes a trio of ESPN 300 prospects out of the Lone Star State.Though the Red River Showdown this weekend figures to carry little fanfare after both have struggled to 2-2 starts, Oklahoma and Texas have shown they can still deliver big TV ratings from the Big 12, as well.Texas overtime win against Notre Dame earned a massive 7.0 overnight rating, making it ESPN/ABCs second-highest watched opening weekend game on record. Even though it kicked off at 11 a.m. Central Time, Oklahoma-Houston was the third-most watched game on opening weekend Saturday.I know the value that conference can bring, the ratings that conference can bring, said the first insider, who added that when Texas finally returns to prominence, the Big 12 will be viewed in a different way than it is now.Texas will be back at some point. And when that happens, nobody is going to be talking about the Big 12 being inadequate. The conference is having a bad year, but they have two national brands that can bring it all back. I see this as a blip, not a trend.Theres more there than people realize.Will Oklahoma and Texas agree?The future of the league they built together some two decades ago hinges on it. Steph Curry Shoes Free Shipping . Kuznetsov, who was selected by the Capitals in the first round of the 2010 NHL Entry Draft, has been playing for his hometown team Chelyabinsk Traktor of the KHL. Cheap Steph Curry Shoes ., for the next three years with the signings on Monday of Daryl Townsend and Michael Carter. https://www.stephencurryshoescheap.com/ . Manuel was offered a position the day he was fired. He accepted earlier this week and the team made the announcement Friday. Steph Curry Shoes For Sale .J. -- Josh Cribbs was in the Pro Bowl in February and out of a job six months later. Wholesale Steph Curry Shoes . Once again Jordan Cieciwa (@FitCityJordan) and I (@LynchOnSports) go head to head in our picks. Last weekend at UFC Fight Night 32 my #TeamLynch got the best of #TeamJC by a score of 9-6. Let us know which side youre on for UFC 167 use the hashtag #TeamLynch or #TeamJC on Twitter. This story is part of ESPN The Magazines Oct. 31 NBA Preview Issue. Subscribe today!Detroit TigersOverall: 49 Title track:?T45 Ownership: 28 Coaching:?T106 Players: 53 Fan relations: 44 Affordability: 45 Stadium experience: 32 Bang for the buck: 59 Change from last year: -3Were now 11 seasons into what we would argue is the greatest period of sustained excellence in Tigers history, a period that includes five trips to the postseason, two appearances in the World Series and just two losing seasons. Only five franchises in baseball have won more games than the Tigers since 2006. But is their window closing?Whats goodComerica Park is gorgeous, and its attendance hasnt slipped below 2.4 million in a season since 2006, so its no surprise that one of the Tigers best rankings comes in stadium experience (32nd overall). This is still a team with star power on the field -- Justin Verlander, Miguel Cabrera, Victor Martinez, Ian Kinsler, Justin Upton -- and that constellation is complemented by a group of younger players who could be the stars of the next generation, from J.D. Martinez to Nick Castellanos to Michael Fulmer. Meanwhile, off the field, the Tigers have a powerful combination of committed ownership (fans appreciate that 87-year-old Mike Ilitch is still passionately pushing his team to win and ranked him 28th in ownership), rabid fan base and sizable market, which gives them a strong financial advantage in a division in which none of their competitors can match them.Whats badFans are clearly unsure about the job manager Brad Ausmus is doing; he ranked just 106th in coaching after a second straighht year missing the playoffs.dddddddddddd His roster for next year is uncertain: For the first time in the free-agent era, the Tigers ended this season with a higher payroll than the Yankees, and many competitors believe this team doesnt have the revenue to sustain a $200 million roster. Dont rule out a massive deal, especially when you start counting how much money is tied up in the Tigers aging core. In a sport thats trending younger every year, bringing back all the stars could be a formula for the same sort of implosion that brought down the mini-dynasty of the Phillies just a few years ago.Whats newDetroit climbed 15 spots in fan relations in 2016, thanks in part to kid-friendly events (kids run the bases every Sunday!) and promotions (Coloring books! Growth charts! A piggy bank!). Thats especially fitting because the Tigers future is largely in the hands of their young pitchers: Michael Fulmer is 23, the likely rookie of the year and a future ace. Daniel Norris is a 23-year-old left-hander with a bright future. Matt Boyd is 25, with a dazzling feel for pitching. When we say its been a long, long, long, long time since any Tigers team has had three young starters such as that, we arent kidding. You have to go back more than a half-century, to 1965, to find the most recent Tigers team before the 2016 edition that had three starting pitchers, age 25 or younger, who made at least 10 starts apiece and all had winning records.Next: Arizona Diamondbacks?| Full rankings ' ' '